Expert Services

We provide technical assistance that is tailored to the unique needs and requests in each jurisdiction. This ranges from staffing government task forces, to holding confidential one-on-one meetings, to testifying before legislatures when asked. We also educate the public through speaking engagements, our Pleading the Sixth blog, and sharing what we know about the right to counsel so you can help fix the issue.

Government Technical Assistance

Speaking Engagements

  • October 17, 2013

    Idaho Legislative Interim Committee on Indigent Defense Boise, Idaho

    David Carroll presents information to the Committee about “How States Structure Right to Counsel Services.”
    Idaho Legislative Interim Committee on Indigent Defense
  • August 15, 2013

    Idaho Legislative Interim Committee on Indigent Defense Boise, Idaho

    David Carroll discusses “The Right to Counsel: Constitutional Requirements, Standards & State Trends.”
    Idaho Legislative Interim Committee on Indigent Defense
  • May 1, 2013

    Michigan House Judiciary Committee Lansing, Michigan

    David Carroll provides testimony on “The Right to Counsel in Michigan 50 Years after Gideon.”
    Michigan House Judiciary Committee
  • January 22, 2013

    Utah State Legislature Salt Lake City, Utah

    David Carroll makes his “Presentation before the President of the Utah Senate and the Speaker of the House.”
    Utah State Legislature
  • July 13, 2015

    National Association of Counties, Annual Conference Charlotte, North Carolina

    David Carroll, along with Preeti Menon of the Office of Justice Programs at American University, presents a workshop at NACo’s 80th Annual Conference & Exposition discussing how county officials and public defenders can join forces to form safer communities.
    National Association of Counties, Annual Conference
  • July 1, 2015

    National Sheriff’s Association Baltimore, Maryland

    David Carroll, along with Preeti Menon of the Office of Justice Programs at American University, presents at the NSA Annual Conference on “What Every Sheriff Should Know About the Sixth Amendment (or, How Criminal Defense Attorneys Improve Public Safety.”
    National Sheriff’s Association
  • June 12, 2015

    Connecticut State Public Defender Hartford, Connecticut

    David Carroll and Jon Mosher provide a joint presentation at the Annual Meeting of Connecticut public defenders on “The Right to Counsel: Systemic Safeguards for the Sixth Amendment.”
    Connecticut State Public Defender
  • January 5, 2015

    6AC Justice Watch program Jackson, Mississippi

    In conjunction with Harvard Law School students and attorneys from Hogan Lovells US LLP, Jon Mosher and Elly Kalfus present “Justice Watch: Studying the Right to Counsel in Mississippi.”
    6AC Justice Watch program
  • December 14, 2014

    U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division Memphis, Tennessee

    David Carroll makes a presentation to Shelby County, Tennessee, criminal justice stakeholders, addressing “Ensuring Justice: A National Perspective on Indigent Defense Systems Building.”
    U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division
  • October 31, 2014

    University of Tennessee College of Law Knoxville, Tennessee

    Jon Mosher presents an “Overview of the National Right to Counsel” at the UT Right to Counsel Symposium. The presentation describes the well-documented and long-standing systemic deficiencies across the country stemming from inadequate funding and resources and explains political and funding reforms responding to the crisis in indigent criminal defense.
    University of Tennessee College of Law
While a criminal trial is not a game in which the participants are expected to enter the ring with a near match in skills, neither is it a sacrifice of unarmed prisoners to gladiators.
— United States v. Cronic (1984)
That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.
— Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
We reject … the premise that, since prosecutions for crimes punishable by imprisonment for less than six months may be tried without a jury, they may also be tried without a lawyer.
— Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)