Expert Services

We provide technical assistance that is tailored to the unique needs and requests in each jurisdiction. This ranges from staffing government task forces, to holding confidential one-on-one meetings, to testifying before legislatures when asked. We also educate the public through speaking engagements, our Pleading the Sixth blog, and sharing what we know about the right to counsel so you can help fix the issue.

Government Technical Assistance

Speaking Engagements

  • March 30, 2023

    Oregon Legislature, Senate Judiciary Committee Salem, Oregon

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher testifies at the invitation of the committee chair in a formal hearing on proposed indigent defense system reforms, including: structural independence; increased financial and qualitative oversight of direct services; and abolishing flat-fee contracting in favor of creating staff government public defender positions.
  • March 28, 2023

    Illinois Judicial Conference Criminal Indigent Defense Taskforce By videoconference

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher and Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel present to the Task Force on 6AC’s evaluation of Illinois, public defender independence, and state accountability.
  • December 20, 2022

    Michigan Indigent Defense Commission Lansing, Michigan

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher presents on statewide structural issues and observations from 6AC’s evaluation in Oakland County (Pontiac), and necessary state legislative and policy reforms.
  • March 1, 2022

    Idaho Judiciary Rules & Administration Committee Boise, Idaho – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll testifies during a formal hearing on Public Defender Commission Rules. Carroll speaks on the history of indigent defense reform in Idaho and the reasonableness of proposed rules at the invitation of the Committee Chair.
  • February 14, 2022

    Idaho Senate Judiciary Committee Boise, Idaho – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll testifies during a formal hearing on Public Defender Commission Rules. Carroll speaks on the history of indigent defense reform in Idaho and the reasonableness of proposed rules at the invitation of the Committee Chair.
  • May 26, 2021

    Illinois Supreme Court Springfield, Illinois – by videoconference

    Deputy Director, Jon Mosher, and Program Manager, Aditi Goel present to the Illinois Supreme Court justices the findings and recommendations from The Right to Counsel in Illinois: Evaluation of Trial-level Public Defense Representation. There are two overarching reasons why the State of Illinois is defaulting on its constitutional right to counsel obligations. First, the state requires counties and courts to provide and predominantly fund indigent defense systems in a way that bakes in governmental interference with the right to counsel. Second, as one of only seven states with no state-level mechanism to oversee any aspect of trial-level right to counsel services, Illinois lacks information about every aspect of the varied indigent defense systems implemented by the county governments and courts in their efforts to fulfill the Sixth Amendment right to counsel responsibilities that the state has delegated to them.
  • August 8, 2022

    Ohio State Bar Association’s Future of Public Defense Taskforce By videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll and Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel present to the subcommittee on the history of the right to counsel in America, 6AC’s evaluation methodology, and a comparison of Ohio’s indigent system to other states, including Michigan, Massachusetts, and Mississippi.
  • March 2, 2022

    Northwestern University Law School Chicago, Illinois – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present to Northwestern University Law School, Bluhm Legal Clinic regarding potential solutions for Illinois’ right to counsel deficiencies, national models, and pitfalls to avoid.
  • March 2, 2022

    University of Virginia School of Law Charlottesville, Virginia – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel speaks as a panelist to law students at UVA Law on the necessary role indigent defense plays in strengthening our nation’s criminal justice system, 6AC’s unique approach to reform work, and 6AC’s recent successful reform efforts. Panelists include Alison Mollman, Staff Attorney, Equal Justice Initiative.
  • February 15, 2022

    Northwestern University Law School Chicago, Illinois – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present to Northwestern University Law School, Bluhm Legal Clinic regarding 6AC’s Illinois study, findings and recommendations.
  • January 12, 2022

    Public Defenseless podcast Nationally available

    Executive Director David Carroll explains how he got into public defense, America’s indigent defense deficiencies, and solutions to be implemented. Particular emphasis is made on actual denial of counsel in misdemeanor courts.
  • November 18, 2021

    US-Asia Law Institute, New York University, School of Law & China University of Political Science and Law Beijing, China – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present in “Effective Defense Representation in Death Penalty Trials in the United States,” a panel exploring how death penalty public defense services are structured and funded in the United States and China. Participants include: Hongyao Wu, Professor of Law, Dean of National Institute of Legal Aid, China University of Political Science and Law; Fan Chongyi, Honorary President of the National Academy of Law, China University of Political Science and Law, and Honorary President, Professor, and Doctoral Supervisor of the Institute of litigation law of China University of Political Science and Law; Miriam Conrad, former Federal Defender for the Districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island; and Ira Belkin, Senior Research Fellow, New York University, School of Law & China University of Political Science and Law.

While a criminal trial is not a game in which the participants are expected to enter the ring with a near match in skills, neither is it a sacrifice of unarmed prisoners to gladiators.

— United States v. Cronic (1984)

That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.

— Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

We reject … the premise that, since prosecutions for crimes punishable by imprisonment for less than six months may be tried without a jury, they may also be tried without a lawyer.

— Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)