Expert Services

We provide technical assistance that is tailored to the unique needs and requests in each jurisdiction. This ranges from staffing government task forces, to holding confidential one-on-one meetings, to testifying before legislatures when asked. We also educate the public through speaking engagements, our Pleading the Sixth blog, and sharing what we know about the right to counsel so you can help fix the issue.

Government Technical Assistance

Speaking Engagements

  • March 28, 2023

    Illinois Judicial Conference Criminal Indigent Defense Taskforce By videoconference

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher and Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel present to the Task Force on 6AC’s evaluation of Illinois, public defender independence, and state accountability.
    Illinois Judicial Conference Criminal Indigent Defense Taskforce
  • December 20, 2022

    Michigan Indigent Defense Commission Lansing, Michigan

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher presents on statewide structural issues and observations from 6AC’s evaluation in Oakland County (Pontiac), and necessary state legislative and policy reforms.
    Michigan Indigent Defense Commission
  • March 1, 2022

    Idaho Judiciary Rules & Administration Committee Boise, Idaho – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll testifies during a formal hearing on Public Defender Commission Rules. Carroll speaks on the history of indigent defense reform in Idaho and the reasonableness of proposed rules at the invitation of the Committee Chair.
    Idaho Judiciary Rules & Administration Committee
  • February 14, 2022

    Idaho Senate Judiciary Committee Boise, Idaho – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll testifies during a formal hearing on Public Defender Commission Rules. Carroll speaks on the history of indigent defense reform in Idaho and the reasonableness of proposed rules at the invitation of the Committee Chair.
    Idaho Senate Judiciary Committee
  • May 26, 2021

    Illinois Supreme Court Springfield, Illinois – by videoconference

    Deputy Director, Jon Mosher, and Program Manager, Aditi Goel present to the Illinois Supreme Court justices the findings and recommendations from The Right to Counsel in Illinois: Evaluation of Trial-level Public Defense Representation. There are two overarching reasons why the State of Illinois is defaulting on its constitutional right to counsel obligations. First, the state requires counties and courts to provide and predominantly fund indigent defense systems in a way that bakes in governmental interference with the right to counsel. Second, as one of only seven states with no state-level mechanism to oversee any aspect of trial-level right to counsel services, Illinois lacks information about every aspect of the varied indigent defense systems implemented by the county governments and courts in their efforts to fulfill the Sixth Amendment right to counsel responsibilities that the state has delegated to them.
    Illinois Supreme Court
  • April 30, 2021

    Illinois Supreme Court, Pre-Trial Practices Implementation Committee By videoconference

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher and Program Manager Aditi Goel present the findings and recommendations from The Right to Counsel in Illinois: Evaluation of Trial-level Public Defense Representation. There are two overarching reasons why the State of Illinois is defaulting on its constitutional right to counsel obligations. First, the state requires counties and courts to provide and predominantly fund indigent defense systems in a way that bakes in governmental interference with the right to counsel. Second, as one of only seven states with no state-level mechanism to oversee any aspect of trial-level right to counsel services, Illinois lacks information about every aspect of the varied indigent defense systems implemented by the county governments and courts in their efforts to fulfill the Sixth Amendment right to counsel responsibilities that the state has delegated to them.
    Illinois Supreme Court, Pre-Trial Practices Implementation Committee
  • February 23, 2023

    Oregon Public Defense Services Commission, Annual Public Defense Providers Summit By videoconference

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher presents the right to counsel in Oregon, and the need for legislative reforms to state’s indigent defense system to correct deficiencies identified in 6AC’s statewide evaluation.
    Oregon Public Defense Services Commission, Annual Public Defense Providers Summit
  • February 8, 2023

    New York University School of Law New York, New York

    Program Manager Rachael Liebert speaks to first-year law students on the important role critical indigent defense systems play in the criminal justice system and the role of defense counsel in plea bargaining.
    New York University School of Law
  • January 11, 2023

    University of Connecticut School of Law Hartford, Connecticut

    Program Manager Rachael Liebert speaks to first-year law students on the critical role strong indigent defense systems play in the criminal justice system and the role of defense counsel in plea bargaining.
    University of Connecticut School of Law
  • November 16, 2022

    Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy, Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management. Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel presents at the program’s "The Myths of Public Safety: Pretrial" speaker series – organized by Program Director Katy Naples-Mitchell and Professor Sandra Susan Smith – on 6AC’s research in various jurisdictions on the early appointment of counsel and systemic pressures that indigent people face to waive their right to counsel.
    Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Malcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy, Program in Criminal Justice Policy and Management.
  • September 2, 2022

    California Revision of the Penal Code By videoconference

    Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel presents on a panel about the early appointment of counsel and observations from 6AC’s evaluation in Santa Cruz, CA. Also as panelists were Professor Paul Heaton at the Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice at UPenn Law, Office of the State Public Defender Indigent Defense Improvement Division Executive Director Galit Lipa, and Associate Judge Juliet J. McKenna of the D.C. Superior Court.
    California Revision of the Penal Code
  • August 8, 2022

    Ohio State Bar Association’s Future of Public Defense Taskforce By videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll and Senior Program Manager Aditi Goel present to the subcommittee on the history of the right to counsel in America, 6AC’s evaluation methodology, and a comparison of Ohio’s indigent system to other states, including Michigan, Massachusetts, and Mississippi.
    Ohio State Bar Association’s Future of Public Defense Taskforce
While a criminal trial is not a game in which the participants are expected to enter the ring with a near match in skills, neither is it a sacrifice of unarmed prisoners to gladiators.
— United States v. Cronic (1984)
That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.
— Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
We reject … the premise that, since prosecutions for crimes punishable by imprisonment for less than six months may be tried without a jury, they may also be tried without a lawyer.
— Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)