Expert Services

We provide technical assistance that is tailored to the unique needs and requests in each jurisdiction. This ranges from staffing government task forces, to holding confidential one-on-one meetings, to testifying before legislatures when asked. We also educate the public through speaking engagements, our Pleading the Sixth blog, and sharing what we know about the right to counsel so you can help fix the issue.

Government Technical Assistance

Speaking Engagements

  • February 17, 2021

    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee Augusta, ME – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll participates to discuss on-going reform efforts in Maine, including: the creation of a statewide appellate defender office; the creation of a trial-level public defender offices in Kennebec County (Augusta); increased assigned counsel compensation rates (up from $60/hour to $80/hour); and, the need to expand staff of the Maine Commission on Indigent Legals Services to ensure adequate financial and quality representation oversight.
    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee
  • January 12, 2021

    Afghanistan Legal Aid High Commission Kabul, Afghanistan – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present “Oversight & Independence: Best Practices in the Delivery of Afghanistan’s Legal Aid Services.” The Legal Aid High Commission is housed in the Ministry of Justice and oversees all indigent defense services throughout the country. For years, the 6AC resisted operating in the international realm under the position that people from the U.S. should not purport themselves to be experts abroad unless and until we have our addressed our own domestic challenges. Now the 6AC understands that other countries can just as readily learn from our mistakes as from our best practices. “Oversight” and “independence” are the two concepts all public defense systems struggle to provide. That is, defense providers must be “independent” to act in the stated interests of their clients, but government also must provide “oversight” to ensure that those defender services are both effective and provided efficiently. The two concepts of “oversight” and “independence” are often in conflict with one another. Finding harmony between those necessary components will make your justice system better. The presentation offers examples, both good and bad, from various of the 50 states comprising the USA in hopes of assisting the Legal Aid High Commission efforts to provide effective representation.
    Afghanistan Legal Aid High Commission
  • November 9, 2020

    Maine Legislature, Government Oversight Committee Augusta, Maine - by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll participates to discuss the Maine Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability (OPEGA) report on the Maine Commission on Indigent Legal Services. The OPEGA report independently verified the lack of quality and financial oversight of indigent defense services in the state.
    Maine Legislature, Government Oversight Committee
  • September 18, 2020

    Illinois Supreme Court, Pretrial Implementation Task Force Chicago, Illinois - by videoconference

    Deputy Director Jon Mosher presents to the task force formally overseeing our statewide evaluation of right to counsel services in Illinois. Mosher shares some of 6AC’s key findings from our study with examples from site work to demonstrate specific concepts. In sum, 6AC established that Illinois has two overarching deficiencies when it comes to the right to counsel: (1) government interference in the delivery of public defense services, which manifests itself in ways that can vary from county to county; and (2) the state of Illinois has no mechanism for providing oversight of right to counsel services at the county level.
    Illinois Supreme Court, Pretrial Implementation Task Force
  • July 24, 2020

    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee work group Augusta, Maine - by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll participates to discuss on-going reform efforts in Maine.
    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee work group
  • March 11, 2020

    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee Augusta, Maine

    Executive Director David Carroll participates to discuss on-going reform efforts in Maine, including the creation of a statewide appellate defender office and trial-level public defender offices in Cumberland (Portland), Kennebec (Augusta), and Penobscot (Bangor) counties.
    Maine Legislature, Judiciary Committee
  • March 2, 2022

    University of Virginia School of Law Charlottesville, Virginia – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel speaks as a panelist to law students at UVA Law on the necessary role indigent defense plays in strengthening our nation’s criminal justice system, 6AC’s unique approach to reform work, and 6AC’s recent successful reform efforts. Panelists include Alison Mollman, Staff Attorney, Equal Justice Initiative.
    University of Virginia School of Law
  • March 2, 2022

    Northwestern University Law School Chicago, Illinois – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present to Northwestern University Law School, Bluhm Legal Clinic regarding potential solutions for Illinois’ right to counsel deficiencies, national models, and pitfalls to avoid.
    Northwestern University Law School
  • February 15, 2022

    Northwestern University Law School Chicago, Illinois – by videoconference

    Program Manager Aditi Goel and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present to Northwestern University Law School, Bluhm Legal Clinic regarding 6AC’s Illinois study, findings and recommendations.
    Northwestern University Law School
  • January 12, 2022

    Public Defenseless podcast Nationally available

    Executive Director David Carroll explains how he got into public defense, America’s indigent defense deficiencies, and solutions to be implemented. Particular emphasis is made on actual denial of counsel in misdemeanor courts.
    Public Defenseless podcast
  • November 18, 2021

    US-Asia Law Institute, New York University, School of Law & China University of Political Science and Law Beijing, China – by videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll and Deputy Director Jon Mosher present in “Effective Defense Representation in Death Penalty Trials in the United States,” a panel exploring how death penalty public defense services are structured and funded in the United States and China. Participants include: Hongyao Wu, Professor of Law, Dean of National Institute of Legal Aid, China University of Political Science and Law; Fan Chongyi, Honorary President of the National Academy of Law, China University of Political Science and Law, and Honorary President, Professor, and Doctoral Supervisor of the Institute of litigation law of China University of Political Science and Law; Miriam Conrad, former Federal Defender for the Districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island; and Ira Belkin, Senior Research Fellow, New York University, School of Law & China University of Political Science and Law.
    US-Asia Law Institute, New York University, School of Law & China University of Political Science and Law
  • October 29, 2021

    Illinois Public Defender Association, Fall 2021 Seminar By videoconference

    Executive Director David Carroll, Deputy Director Jon Mosher, and Program Manager Aditi Goel present the findings and recommendations from The Right to Counsel in Illinois: Evaluation of Trial-level Public Defense Representation. There are two overarching reasons why the State of Illinois is defaulting on its constitutional right to counsel obligations. First, the state requires counties and courts to provide and predominantly fund indigent defense systems in a way that bakes in governmental interference with the right to counsel. Second, as one of only seven states with no state-level mechanism to oversee any aspect of trial-level right to counsel services, Illinois lacks information about every aspect of the varied indigent defense systems implemented by the county governments and courts in their efforts to fulfill the Sixth Amendment right to counsel responsibilities that the state has delegated to them.
    Illinois Public Defender Association, Fall 2021 Seminar
While a criminal trial is not a game in which the participants are expected to enter the ring with a near match in skills, neither is it a sacrifice of unarmed prisoners to gladiators.
— United States v. Cronic (1984)
That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.
— Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
We reject … the premise that, since prosecutions for crimes punishable by imprisonment for less than six months may be tried without a jury, they may also be tried without a lawyer.
— Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)